医学教育つれづれ

医学教育に関する論文のPOINTを書き出した備忘録的なブログです。

評価

医学教育プログラムで一般的に使用されている教育ピラミットのガイド

A Guide to Educational Pyramids Commonly Used in Medical Education ProgramsDzara, Kristina PhD, MMSc1; Gooding, Holly MD, MSc2Author InformationAcademic Medicine: February 2022 - Volume 97 - Issue 2 - p 313doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003816…

シングルベストアンサー(SBA)試験のエラーを利用した指導法

Using very short answer errors to guide teachingOliver Putt, Rachel Westacott, Amir H. Sam, Mark Gurnell, Celia A. BrownFirst published: 25 January 2022 https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13458 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.1345…

記憶、信頼性、洞察力:ビデオベースのフィードバックが客観的構造の臨床試験におけるより深い考察と学習を促進する方法

Memory, credibility and insight: How video-based feedback promotes deeper reflection and learning in objective structured clinical examsAlexandra Makrides & Peter YeatesORCID IconPublished online: 08 Jan 2022Download citation https://doi.o…

UCATの予測有効性の評価-システマティック・レビュー

Assessing the predictive validity of the UCAT—A systematic review and narrative synthesisLaksha BalaORCID Icon, Stephen Pedder, Amir H. SamORCID Icon & Celia BrownORCID IconPublished online: 23 Nov 2021Download citation https://doi.org/10.…

人生経験は研修への準備を予測できるか?ある家庭医療研修施設の分析

Can Life Experiences Predict Readiness for Residency? A Family Medicine Residency’s AnalysisShow all authorsMichael E. Busha, Brock McMillen, Jeffrey Greene, ...First Published November 24, 2021 Research Article https://doi.org/10.1177/238…

COVID-19パンデミックに対応したオーストラリアの医学部におけるOSCEの変化

Changes to objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) at Australian medical schools in response to the COVID-19 pandemicC HealORCID Icon, K D’Souza, L HallORCID Icon, J Smith, K JonesORCID Icon & The ACCLAiM collaborationPublished o…

基準設定プロセスと学生のパフォーマンスに関する試験官の理解をサポートするためのフィードバック。AMEE Guide No.145

Feedback to support examiners’ understanding of the standard-setting process and the performance of students: AMEE Guide No. 145Mohsen Tavakol, Brigitte E. Scammell & Angela P. WetzelPublished online: 02 Nov 2021Download citation https://d…

卒前後の医学教育におけるmini-CEXの有用性について。 BEMEガイドNo.59

The utility of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: A BEME review: BEME Guide No. 59Sara Mortaz HejriORCID Icon, Mohammad JaliliORCID Icon, Rasoul MasoomiORCID Icon, Mandana Shirazi, Saharn…

医療学習者のリフレクションのための評価ツール。スコーピングレビュー

Assessment tools for reflection in healthcare learners: A scoping reviewCassandra Préfontaine, Isabelle Gaboury, Hélène Corriveau, Jacinthe Beauchamp, Chantal Lemire & Marie-Josée AprilPublished online: 13 Nov 2021Download citation https:/…

ファカルティ・ディベロップメント・プログラムの評価の改善

Improving the Evaluation of Faculty Development ProgramsChen, Weichao PhD1; Berry, Andrea MPA2; Drowos, Joanna DO, MPH, MBA3; Lama, Anna MA4; Kleinheksel, A. J. PhD5Author InformationAcademic Medicine: October 2021 - Volume 96 - Issue 10 -…

OSCEで学生のコミュニケーションスキルを判断する際の患者の関与の理解

Understanding patient involvement in judging students’ communication skills in OSCEsAlice MoultORCID Icon, Robert K. McKinleyORCID Icon & Peter YeatesORCID IconPublished online: 08 Sep 2021Download citation https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X…

医療専門職教育における評価-成果を測定するだけで十分か?

Evaluation in health professions education—Is measuring outcomes enough?Louise M. Allen, Margaret Hay, Claire Palermo,First published: 31 August 2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14654 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.14654…

医歯薬学生のe-professionalismに対する態度を測定する尺度の開発と検証。SMePROF-Sスケール

Development and validation of scale for measuring attitudes towards e-professionalism among medical and dental students: SMePROF-S scale Marko Marelić, Joško Viskić, Lovela Machala Poplašen, Danko Relić, Dražen Jokić & Tea Vukušić Rukavina…

信頼性と汎用性のあるクラークシップ・コンピテンシー評価を構築する。

Building reliable and generalizable clerkship competency assessments: Impact of ‘hawk-dove’ correctionSally A. SantenORCID Icon, Michael RyanORCID Icon, Marieka A. HelouORCID Icon, Alicia Richards, Robert A. Perera, Kellen Haley, show allP…

医療専門職教育における評価。実用性の向上とイノベーションの支援

Evaluation in health professions education: Enhancing utility and supporting innovationDavid Rojas Gualdron, Kathryn Parker,First published: 16 September 2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13416 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…

研修医応募者のパフォーマンスを予測する能力を向上させる。状況判断テストの妥当性の証明

Improving Our Ability to Predict Resident Applicant Performance: Validity Evidence for a Situational Judgment TestMichael J. CullenORCID Icon, Charlene ZhangORCID Icon, Brittany Marcus-Blank, Jonathan P. BramanORCID Icon, Ezgi Tiryaki, Moj…

19項目の「臨床実習における患者フィードバック」(PFCP)質問票

Let’s ask the patient – composition and validation of a questionnaire for patients’ feedback to medical students Karin Björklund, Terese Stenfors, Gunnar H. Nilsson, Hassan Alinaghizadeh & Charlotte Leanderson BMC Medical Education volume …

オタワ2020 programmatic assessmentのためのコンセンサス・ステートメント - 1. 原則の合意

Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment – 1. Agreement on the principlesSylvia Heeneman, Lubberta H. de Jong, Luke J. Dawson, Tim J. WilkinsonORCID Icon, Anna Ryan, Glendon R. Tait, show allPublished online: 03 Aug 2021…

複数のチェックによる客観的構造化臨床試験(OSCE)における試験官のばらつきの影響の測定

Measuring the Effect of Examiner Variability in a Multiple-Circuit Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)Yeates, Peter MRCP, PhD1; Moult, Alice MSc, PhD2; Cope, Natalie PhD3; McCray, Gareth MA, MRes, PhD4; Xilas, Eleftheria MBChB…

総括的な委託判断の妥当性について

On the validity of summative entrustment decisionsClaire TouchieORCID Icon, Benjamin KinnearORCID Icon, Daniel SchumacherORCID Icon, Holly Caretta-WeyerORCID Icon, Stanley J. HamstraORCID Icon, Danielle HartORCID Icon, show allPublished on…

医学生のためのパフォーマンス・フィードバック・ツールの設計とユーザビリティ・テスト

Design and usability testing of an in-house developed performance feedback tool for medical students Yadira Roa Romero, Hannah Tame, Ylva Holzhausen, Mandy Petzold, Jan-Vincent Wyszynski, Harm Peters, Mohammed Alhassan-Altoaama, Monika Dom…

評価の偏り:名前をつけて、リフレーミングして、チェックイン

Bias in assessment: name, reframe, and check inTyra L. Fainstad, Adelaide H. McClintock, Lalena M. YarrisFirst published: 30 March 2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13351 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13351?af=R 医学教育に…

教育理論の実践-第3巻第2部:妥当性

EDUCATION THEORY MADE PRACTICAL – VOLUME 3, PART 2: VALIDITY AUTHORS: REBECCA SHAW; CARLY SILVESTER (@EDFORBEGINNERS) EDITOR: DIMITRIOS PAPANAGNOU MAIN AUTHORS OR ORIGINATORS: SAMUEL MESSICK; MICHAEL KANE OTHER IMPORTANT AUTHORS OR WORKS: …

クラークシップの採点をベッドサイド重視に戻す

Bringing clerkship grading back to the bedsideMichael S. Ryan, Kellen E. Haley, Marieka Helou, Mark H. Ryan, Fidelma Rigby, Sally A SantenFirst published: 11 January 2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13325 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/do…

教育理論の実践 第3巻 第1部 ボルマンとディールの4フレーム・モデル

EDUCATION THEORY MADE PRACTICAL – VOLUME 3, PART 1: BOLMAN AND DEAL’S FOUR-FRAME MODEL AUTHORS: LEXIE MANNIX (@ALMANNIXMD); SHAWN MONDOUX (@DRSHAWNQI) ; DAVID STORY (@AESCULAPIANEM) EDITOR: MICHAEL GOTTLIEB (@MGOTTLIEBMD) MAIN AUTHORS OR O…

教育理論の実践-第3巻第7部:リアリスト評価

EDUCATION THEORY MADE PRACTICAL – VOLUME 3, PART 7: REALIST EVALUATION AUTHORS: JASON AN; CHRISTINE STEHMAN (@CRSEMCCCF); RANDY SORGE EDITOR: JORDAN SPECTOR MAIN AUTHORS OR ORIGINATORS: R PAWSON & N TILLEYOTHER IMPORTANT AUTHORS OR WORKS: …

CBTとOSCEのスコアは、日本における研修医マッチングと国家試験の結果を予測する。

Computer-based test (CBT) and OSCE scores predict residency matching and National Board assessment results in Japan Shoko Horita, Yoon-Soo Park, Daisuke Son & Masato Eto BMC Medical Education volume 21, Article number: 85 (2021) bmcmededuc…

プログラム評価。はじめに、その基準

Program Evaluation: Getting Started and Standards Dorene F. Balmer, PhD (@dorenebalmer) ; Janet M. Riddle, MD (@JanetRiddleDME) ; Deborah Simpson, PhD (@debsimpson3)J Grad Med Educ (2020) 12 (3): 345–346.https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-0…

評価計画と分析の実施 誰が、何を、いつ、どのように

Implementing the Evaluation Plan and Analysis: Who, What, When, and How Dorene F. Balmer, PhD (@dorenebalmer) ; Jennifer A. Rama, MD, MEd (@jenramacastro) ; Deborah Simpson, PhD (@debsimpson3)J Grad Med Educ (2021) 13 (1): 129–130.https://…

programmatic assessmentのための12のヒント

Twelve Tips for programmatic assessmentC.P.M. Van Der Vleuten, L.W.T. Schuwirth, E.W. Driessen, M.J.B. Govaerts & S. HeenemanPages 641-646 | Published online: 20 Nov 2014Download citation https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388 https:…